Site search

Site Navigation

Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Realtime Death Toll Counter

Yeah, yeah, I know, it’s morbid and tasteless, but it’s fascinating and it sure puts some perspective on things. Based on statistics from the World Health Organization.

Script Author: Peter Gehrig - Script Source: 24fun.com

, , , , , ,

Comments

Comment from SOON
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:21 am

I will die someday.

Comment from yeah
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:25 am

6.5 billion will die in 100 years
that’s 2 every second

Comment from Chad
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:30 am

Not to sound morbid but we need more deaths. The world is over-populated as it is.

Comment from doubleplus
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:42 am

bookmarked. i hope you don’t take this down anytime soon.

Comment from sm
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:46 am

Chad…are you volunteering?

Comment from tum
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:49 am

how many people die in 24 hours?

Pingback from Realtime World Death Toll Counter « News Coctail
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:50 am

[…] Realtime World Death Toll Counter Filed under: Uncategorized — recar @ 7:04 am Realtime World Death Toll Counter Yeah, yeah, I know, it ’s morbid and tasteless, but it’s fascinating and it sure puts some perspective on things. Based on statistics from the World Health Organization.[news] [offbeat news] [world & business] […]

Comment from Arne
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:04 am

How about a birth-counter?

Comment from dagon
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:17 am

I don’t wanna rain on your parades, but there are initiatives to change the rate of the counter (and make people live longer). Look here:

http://www.sens.org/

Just as a speculation - can you imagine if any of that works in 20 years (In rich countries) ? Too quick? Why? Internet rolled over the world in less.

Comment from sam
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:23 am

abortion doesnt count as a death!!

Comment from Peter
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:30 am

I agree, it is a little much to call abortions a type of death, in many ways the aborted “person” is no more alive than any other few-cell organism (by few I mean under millions). If were to count the death of all the few-cell organism, this would be a much different counter.

Comment from Peter
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:30 am

Overall, interesting counter to look at, bit depressing but nice work.

Pingback from 917 Studios - Its time to think outside the triangle!
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:46 am

[…] Real-Time Death Counter - Reality hits you don’t it? Ghost in the Mirror - Reality hits you again doesn’t it?Big Day - Save the day huh? No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> […]

Comment from Socks Manly
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:48 am

It should continue to list marijuana deaths at 0 indefinately.

Comment from Depopulate Now
Time: March 27, 2007, 3:03 am

Earth can sustain maybe half a billion people. The current rate of overpopulation consumes far more resources than the planet can replenish and leaves more toxins in the environment than the earth can cleanse. Either we reduce population to a sustainable rate or we will all die after making the planet inhospitable to human life.

Comment from TZ
Time: March 27, 2007, 3:08 am

@Sam & Peter : who can tell at what number a group of cells is human ? It’s only speculation. BTW, some abortions can take place very late in some countries.

Comment from Angus Exema
Time: March 27, 2007, 3:46 am

Obviously the Abortion death rate is referring to the mothers, not the unborn.

Comment from Depopulate Now Is Crazy
Time: March 27, 2007, 3:47 am

@depopulate now: Where the hell did you get that number? Just pull it out of your head? Not sure if you know, but today there are about 300 million people in the US. Are you saying the US can’t sustain that population? Have you ever been to Wyoming? Nebraska? Kansas? ALASKA? So, if we accept that the US has a sustainable population (for example, let’s say we have a forcible redistribution of people from the crowded cities to the uncrowded states), then that leaves only 200 million people _in the rest of the world_. You’ve been drinking too much punch if that makes any sense whatsoever to you.

Comment from Um, ok
Time: March 27, 2007, 4:45 am

@Angus Exema: Why is that so obvious? You are just trying to justify an abortion as not killing. Nice try.

Comment from pro-choice
Time: March 27, 2007, 5:29 am

Abortion is not killing, unless past the third trimester. This shouldn’t be based on morals people.

Comment from GilSays
Time: March 27, 2007, 5:55 am

Ahhh….this is not about moral judgement. Abortion related death is simply that, deaths related to abortion. People do die during that procedure, it has nothing to do with the unborn child.

If you want to be morally concerned, every 5 minutes 3 fires die needlessly!!

Comment from David Irving
Time: March 27, 2007, 6:53 am

“Doctor, doctor will I die.”
“Yes, my child, and so will I.”

Comment from igdrasil
Time: March 27, 2007, 7:04 am

what about people dying from hunger?

Comment from rob
Time: March 27, 2007, 7:09 am

Every second, let’s count the number of people that don’t die.

Comment from Derek Clark
Time: March 27, 2007, 7:36 am

I agree a birth counter would be awesome, but living in a “3rd” world country with AIDS apparently abundant it doesn’t really seem that bad when put into perspective.

Comment from to chad
Time: March 27, 2007, 8:15 am

the world is far from overpopulated

Comment from david sutherland
Time: March 27, 2007, 8:15 am

call me biased but I’m not mathematically impaired.

those stats on abortion are way under-counted.

makes me wonder if it wasn’t consciously motivated.

1 per 600 seconds for the whole world?

Supposedly the numbers actually dropped in the USA from high 3700’s in late 90’s to low 3000’s. Even at 3000 exactly IN THE USA ALONE that’s over 2 abortions every minute in the USA ALONE.

Some say world-wide as high as 126,000 per day– that’s 1.45 every second.

Somebody is not telling the truth about the stats.

see: The Alan Guttmacher Institute. (www.agi-usa.org)

Comment from Hammer
Time: March 27, 2007, 8:18 am

David, the death toll for abortions is not based on the number of abortions performed a day, it’s the number of deaths to women that are caused by abortions.

Comment from Ceil
Time: March 27, 2007, 8:24 am

@david sutherland: A fetus isn’t a life to be tallied. I think a would-be mother dies every ten minutes.

Comment from iamsjn
Time: March 27, 2007, 8:46 am

I know the Earth is a big place but ya gotta wonder, where the heck are all these dead bodies going to be buried? Yea, some will be cremated but a vast majority will just be buried.

It’s gonna be real crowded 6 feet under!

Comment from Jason
Time: March 27, 2007, 9:21 am

To quote: “Abortion doesn’t count as death!!!”

What magically makes a person a “real person” once they exit the birth canal and take their first breath? Or, do you place personhood at a different event? At what point does the death of cells become the death of a person? If you can’t define (which I’ve yet to hear pro-choicers agree on any sort of “standard” for personhood), then you have to go with the earliest possible point in the development cycle—therefore, abortion equates to death.

I’m glad to see abortion listed.

Comment from Pigzig.
Time: March 27, 2007, 9:24 am

menz r ded frum aborshun 2 LOL

Comment from flan
Time: March 27, 2007, 9:29 am

wow - really makes you think!

www.thisblogisabomb.com

Comment from peter
Time: March 27, 2007, 9:47 am

Interestingly a huge amount of these death are fairly easy to prevent with some simple vaccinations or antibiotics, and all people want to talk about are abortions,

Comment from Doug
Time: March 27, 2007, 9:59 am

// CREDITS:
// Realtime Death Counter 2.01
// By Peter Gehrig
// Copyright (c) 2003 Peter Gehrig. All rights reserved.
// Permission given to use the script provided that this notice remains as is.
// Additional scripts can be found at http://www.24fun.com
// info@24fun.com
// 10/6/2003
// The script is based on statistics by World Health Organisation

// IMPORTANT:
// If you add this script to a script-library or script-archive
// you have to add a highly visible link to
// http://www.24fun.com on the webpage
// where this script will be featured

Wheres the link to the author?

Comment from annoyed
Time: March 27, 2007, 10:19 am

The vast majority of abortions are not intentionally induced attempts at birth control.

They are naturally occurring events where the blastocyst does not properly implant itself in the uterine lining and never matures beyond a few cell devisions before being flushed from the body.

It is a very frequent occurrence that goes completely unnoticed unless the mother/couple are undergoing a clinical test, or having fertility complications and the event is tracked chemically during treatment.

So if “Death by abortion” is to be tracked, it should specify between intentional abortive acts, and naturally occurring abortions. The number for the latter is roughly two or three times the number of successful births per second.

So, do we place the guilt the mother or God for this frequent but unknown “murder?”

Comment from viju
Time: March 27, 2007, 10:21 am

to think that u will be just a flickering number there !

Comment from Hammer
Time: March 27, 2007, 10:47 am

“Wheres the link to the author?”

Well, Doug, does this look like a script-archive or script-library to you?

I went ahead and added a link to the site anyway, just to keep idiots that can’t read happy.

Comment from LinZe
Time: March 27, 2007, 10:58 am

and borns??

Comment from caramia
Time: March 27, 2007, 11:01 am

Abortion is the death of human life..no matter what age the human fetus is.

An ‘inconvenient truth’ .. to the pro-abrotion crowd.

Comment from Robert Baker
Time: March 27, 2007, 11:04 am

Thats quite shocking really.

Comment from Axel
Time: March 27, 2007, 11:30 am

You wankers, abortion here is referring to women who died while having an abortion, not to the number of unborn fetuses destroyed. Seriously, go somewhere else to debate whether something is “living” or not.

Comment from CRaig
Time: March 27, 2007, 11:31 am

Don’t worry according to the Mayan predictions we might all be dead in 2012 - read for more details - http://www.aventurasclub.com/mayandoomsday.en.html

Comment from Hammer
Time: March 27, 2007, 12:10 pm

According to Al Bore, we’ve got less time than that.

Comment from Saad Syed
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:00 pm

STOP IT!!! i dont want 2 die

Comment from pro-choice/anti-abortion
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:11 pm

For all of you who refuse to educate yourselves, abortion is a death/murder of a life after 22 weeks. So on a daily basis women and doctors are legally committing murder and no one can argue this point. If you think that you can, you definitely need to keep up with current events.

Comment from david
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:22 pm

@igdrasil I spent a long time wondering that myself.

good luck finding any

Comment from asqwasqw
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:24 pm

The abortion they are referring to is mothers dying from having an abortion, not the fetuses. It doesn’t matter whether the child is considered dead or not, it is only the mother that counts! And abortion does not equal murder, by any wording of the law.

Comment from Shotty
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:29 pm

Comment from Um, ok
Time: March 27, 2007, 4:45 am

@Angus Exema: Why is that so obvious? You are just trying to justify an abortion as not killing. Nice try.

Um, because there are a lot more abortions that take place then on the counter?

Comment from david
Time: March 27, 2007, 1:33 pm

crazy people include:

*peoplcrazy people include:

*people who are more concerned with aborted fetuses versus people dying of aids

*people who actually think that overpopulation is a problem

*people who think that mayans predicted our death

*people who think death in an engineering problem (sens)
e who are more concerned with aborted featuses versus people dying of aids

*pople who actually think that overpopulation is a problem

*people who think that myans predicted our death

Comment from who cares
Time: March 27, 2007, 2:01 pm

I could care less about abortion, but let’s get the power back to the male and ban it.

Whattaya think?

Comment from Peter
Time: March 27, 2007, 10:32 pm

I am glad the “abortion” counter meaning was cleared up, thank you.

Comment from Uhhh
Time: March 28, 2007, 7:59 am

If this is “realtime” why does it keep counting when i’m offline…? >_>

Comment from Référenceur
Time: March 28, 2007, 1:03 pm

Do I save someone when i’m offline? :D :D :D

Comment from Rick
Time: March 28, 2007, 3:09 pm

To Sam: Abortion doesn’t count as a death unless you are the baby being “killed”!

Comment from Almightytom
Time: March 28, 2007, 3:09 pm

i just read the script for that counter, and its not what id call accurate. it takes the number of people who have died from each cause, probably from last year, and averages it out so that if you left it running for a year, it would reach those numbers for each cause. i dont think that people die of these causes on a schedule. sure, it puts things into perspective, but its a flawed perspective. according to that script, we could kill 365 people with a single bomb, and that counter would average it out and say that one person died from that cause per day.

i thought this would be pulling actual statistics dynamically from the WHO, but instead its just showing us past statistics.

Comment from Hammer
Time: March 28, 2007, 3:26 pm

You sure don’t expect much do you, Almightytom? LOL

Of course it’s not completely accurate and it’s not actually ‘real time’, but the stats are compiled based on the reported number of deaths in the past and then some factors are taken into account, like the total population of the world. Change your clock back a hundred years and you’ll see that the results change dramatically.

Do you seriously believe that anyone could tell you exactly how many people are dying from what in ‘real time’? When the Trade Centers fell on 9/11, it took days to compile the actual death toll. But this is world wide deaths. How long do you think it took to get the actual death toll when the tsunami hit Asia a couple years ago?

This chart is presented for entertainment and to make people think, that’s it.

Comment from dontbesuchretards
Time: March 28, 2007, 8:00 pm

@ anyone who is against abortion:
human life shouldn’t be measured at conseption or whatever trimester they’re in, it should be measured from whenever the foetus has consciousness. If is not developed enough to have some kind of self awareness then you cant kill it cause it never lived

Comment from Shirley Hodge
Time: March 29, 2007, 3:59 am

Death is as much a part of life as being born, so why is everyone so bent out of shape about it. The ridiculous thing about human death is that we do not let our bodies return to the earth from where they came and help nourish the Earth instead we stick ourselves in impervious boxes, fill the veins with stuff that makes normal decay an impossibility and bury ourselves in designated plots called cemetarys. How idiotic can one get.

Comment from david sutherland
Time: March 29, 2007, 4:06 am

The abortion stat is very interesting.

Is it saying that if people didn’t have any abortions then these womyn wouldn’t be dying?

///

I found a different WHO stat on babies (and human embryos) that die every day from abortion. And before the reader gets in a hissy about me calling a foetus a baby, please look it up on dictionary.com: baby: “5. a human fetus”

http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/unsafe_abortion_estimates_04/

According to this WHO statistic, in 2000 “Worldwide an estimated 68,000 women die as a consequence of unsafe abortion.”

That’s .129 deaths per minute, or every 7.72 minutes a women dies as a consequence of an unsafe abortion.

Well if you are pro-abortion then your answer to this problem is more “safe” abortions. (”Safe Abortion” is an oxymoron when you consider who is being treated/mistreated.)

If you are anti-abortion your answer to senseless unsafe abortion deaths is: Have less abortions and less women will die. You can’t with a serious face tell me that any significant percentage of 19 million unsafe abortions were necessary to save the life of the mother. If you have less than 19 millions unsafe abortions you will have less women dying.

Hammer, why don’t you have some guts and handle the heat of some controversy and put things into perspective…. ? — draw a line at the bottom for these 2000 WHO stats and ***include the number of embryos and babies*** that die every day to to “unsafe abortion” ???

Now for the babies who are killed “safely” we will get no reporting. For some reason those statistics are “private” and no one should know what the figures truly are. — try to find a breakdown of abortions by state or county for instance.

But for those babies and embryos who are killed (or attempted to be killed) by “unsafe” means, WHO estimates that in 2000, *** 19,000,000 were terminated. ***

*** The World Health Organization says that one in ten pregnancies end in abortion. ***

Whether you are for or against abortion this stat should impress those who think abortion should be “rare, safe and legal”– is one in ten, “rare”?

WHO says that EVERY MINUTE more than 36 unsafe abortions take place worldwide. If these are successful abortions this means an unique baby or embryo is killed every 1.65 seconds.

And consider that when a baby is killed by abortion at times there is a sibling involved–twins or greater–so these numbers go higher…

ahh.. my firefox crashed and only recovered the top part of this msg.

– to the gal who pulled out the played argument that [god is the greatest murderer b/c of miscarriages] — please. Not everyone acknowledges God. Seriously though, this isn’t why it’s a bad argument. It’s bad because it misses the cause and effect and shifts responsibility.

For instance… people have heart attacks. We have more knowledge than we used to and we know why some heart attacks occur. For other people they appear to be in great shape yet they still may die of a heart attack. I think the same is true with miscarriage. We actually know some health factors that can contribute to higher a miscarriage rate. So we can’t just blame God for heart attacks or miscarriages… even when we don’t fully understand why they occur.

But the “God is the biggest murderer” argument is even more flawed because it actually *tries to justify abortion because, some babies die in miscarriage. *

That is bad logic. It’s like saying that because some men have heart attacks and die that I should therefore have the right to stab a man in the heart and kill him… you know, ‘because God kills men with heart-attacks, so I should be able to also’

again, the simple way to remember this idea is

“just because people fall down stairs, it doesn’t give us the right to push people down the stairs.”

Unfortunately in the case of abortion, it’s the truth is “just because people have heart attacks it doesn’t mean we have the right to rip a babies heart into pieces with a suction and evacuation machine.”

(ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortions#Surgical_abortion )

I said I wasn’t mathematically impaired but perhaps I am. Anyone want to check my numbers. Please correct me my stats if I was wrong. I took the number per year and divided /365 days, by 24 hours, by 60 minutes and then where appropriate by 60 seconds. That’s for the number of events per minute or second. To find the number of seconds per event I took that number and divided one into it. (reversed event per time vs. time per event.)

Bloody world we live in when one in ten live births is accompanied by an unsafe abortion! Here’s to living!

Pingback from Realtime Death Toll Counter. « Jabberwocky’s Chlamydia
Time: March 29, 2007, 4:32 am

[…] Death Counter […]

Pingback from 86400 » ¿Por qué nos morimos?
Time: March 29, 2007, 4:58 am

[…] En poco más de 1 hora he podido impresionarme por, no sólo la cantidad de muertes que hay, sino de qué tipo son en general. En HammerUncut tienen un programita hecho en Web que estadísticamente saca el listado de los tipos de muerte que hay a tiempo real en todo el mundo acorde a las estadísticas dadas por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Algunos resultados son los siguientes: […]

Comment from Hammer
Time: March 29, 2007, 6:56 am

“Hammer, why don’t you have some guts and handle the heat of some controversy and put things into perspective…. ? — draw a line at the bottom for these 2000 WHO stats and ***include the number of embryos and babies*** that die every day to to “unsafe abortion” ???”

I’m not the one that turned this into a discussion about abortion. Frankly, I think there are far more disturbing numbers of deaths from things on that list besides abortion, like Dengue.

Seriously though, I find the ‘low birth weight’ stat just as disturbing as abortion. Premies die every day and it wasn’t the woman’s fault, but think about how many babies die every day because of something their mothers did, like doing drugs during the pregnancy. Some of you consider abortion murder, but I’d say that any woman that consumes alcohol or drugs and/or smokes during her pregnancy should be charged with criminal neglect or murder if the baby dies or is born with deformities and it can be proven that it was due to something the mother did.

How’s that for guts?

Comment from Action
Time: March 29, 2007, 6:47 pm

So why is everyone affraid of dying? Is life here on earth better than Being in Heaven? I do not not think so!

Comment from LOL
Time: April 2, 2007, 8:45 am

LOL, Christianity

Comment from Globalwarming awareness2007
Time: April 4, 2007, 12:00 pm

This is really scary !

Pingback from ДншдЬ: Realtime Death Toll Counter
Time: April 8, 2007, 5:44 am

[…] I know it is not a suitable topic in the morning, but it is an odd thing.check it out here, it is updated every second. […]

Comment from danthong
Time: April 8, 2007, 8:18 am

Please add judicial executions as a cause of death

Comment from Brett
Time: April 18, 2007, 11:34 pm

This is awesome. Please do not remove. More people need to see this, especially after the 33 deaths at VA tech. People are blinded by the media and need to see this.

Comment from Motorcycle Guy
Time: April 22, 2007, 8:47 am

Wow you should have made this embeddable code it’s a pretty nifty script.

Comment from Cinci
Time: April 22, 2007, 9:13 am

Your Abortion stats are way off. 8 babies die from abortion every minute in the US alone. Worldwide its at least 100 per minute. Compared to this the rest of the stats are just a joke. You are probably prochoice and don’t want to acknowledge that you are in support of murder, this is why you made the stats inaccurate.

Comment from Hammer
Time: April 22, 2007, 10:32 am

Cinci, I didn’t make the stats. A script calculates the number of deaths reported to the World Health Organization for previous years.

Also, as has been stated many times in the comments above yours that you obviously did not read, the abortion stats do not show aborted fetus deaths, they show deaths related to abortions. Apparently the WHO doesn’t consider a fetus to be a person and if you have a problem with that, take it up with them.

Comment from Cinci
Time: May 4, 2007, 11:24 am

Trust me, I know full well that the WHO is a pro-abortion organization. They fight every day around the world to secure a woman’s “right” to kill her baby. Their agenda sickens me, but about the only thing I can do is continue to write letters to congress encouraging them to cut their funding.

Comment from Hammer
Time: May 4, 2007, 11:34 am

Then maybe you shouldn’t have used the word “you”.

I had no agenda, I simply thought it was interesting. Those of you that want to focus on the abortion statistics, fell free to knock yourselves out, but don’t make assumptions about my personal feelings on abortion.

I suppose you think I’m pro cancer too, right?

Comment from average person
Time: May 29, 2007, 6:35 pm

sad to know we do this to our selfs

Pingback from ja en som mil » Arxiu » exe.memory.card.
Time: June 14, 2007, 9:08 pm

[…] […]

Comment from Blackburn
Time: June 20, 2007, 4:22 pm

Oh My God!!!

thats so sad…. :(

Pingback from Digg Top OffBeat News of all times » Realtime World Death Toll Counter
Time: November 3, 2007, 10:27 am

[…] read more | digg story […]

Pingback from Health related TV shows » Realtime World Death Toll Counter
Time: December 22, 2007, 12:19 am

[…] read more | digg story […]

Comment from Thomas
Time: January 2, 2008, 11:11 am

0 ! always 0 for “war” !
it’s surprising, isn’t it ?

Pingback from c toi la mort «
Time: February 3, 2008, 5:41 pm

[…] Realtime Death Toll Counter- Voici un site internet très sérieux  basé sur les statistiques de l’Organisation Mondiale pour la Santé – il permet de voir seconde par seconde, le nombre de morts dans le monde, et plus vicieusement la cause de décès. Petite remarque assassine, ils ont oublié la ligne : Mort en regardant“realtime Death”. . Ce qui eût été une mise en abîme assez savoureuse. Ci-dessous un arrêt sur image à la 666ème seconde (dimanche 3 février 2008 à 23h27): […]

Comment from Vanessa
Time: February 26, 2008, 6:04 pm

Abortion counts as a death. Especially if it’s induced, and not natural. Yes, I AM Pro-LIFE, because aborted babies are lives lost.
End of rant, thanks for putting this up. :\

Comment from Morris T.
Time: March 1, 2008, 5:44 am

Cross country skiing is great if you live in a small country.

Comment from MG
Time: March 4, 2008, 11:10 am

Et vous trouver ça amusan de conter les morts????

Comment from Serac
Time: June 6, 2008, 9:11 pm

I think that the road-toll deaths are majorly underestimated.

Comment from Atmosfera
Time: July 5, 2008, 8:33 pm

yo creo k ami tos me comen la poya nose k opinais vosotros?

Comment from Spud
Time: July 10, 2008, 12:55 am

if this was true, war would be ALOT higher.

Comment from KJ
Time: August 2, 2008, 1:33 am

what exactly would count as war??? I’m sure the count should be higher … well … there is like 6.8billion and counting people on earth afterall, a hundred thou deaths a day isn’t really going to affect things.

Comment from tyler
Time: September 22, 2008, 8:39 pm

The death toll counter is neither morbid or tasteless, it is a ongoing fact of life. Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, it is occuring as we speak.
It is fascinating to place this information in this manner so as to gain some kind of perspective of this phenomenon.

Comment from tyler
Time: September 22, 2008, 8:43 pm

It does seem underreported, the deaths from war. However, nothing is perfect, and this is only a rough guide to give us perspective.

Pingback from ¿Por qué nos morimos? « De todo un poco
Time: September 24, 2008, 10:46 pm

[…] ¿Por qué nos morimos? En poco más de 1 hora he podido impresionarme por, no sólo la cantidad de muertes que hay, sino de qué tipo son en general. En HammerUncut tienen un programita hecho en Web que estadísticamente saca el listado de los tipos de muerte que hay a tiempo real en todo el mundo acorde a las estadísticas dadas por la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Algunos resultados son los siguientes: […]

Pingback from Real Time Death Toll Counter « Hope For Peace’s Weblog
Time: September 27, 2008, 12:15 am

[…] September 27, 2008 http://www.hammeruncut.com/realtime-death-toll-counter/ […]

Comment from Ger
Time: November 15, 2008, 6:02 pm

this thing is neat ! goinna keep thsi runnign to see how many people statisticly died while i slept !

AND THEN I WILL ABORT A FEW BABIES

hehehe ,

Comment from Ger
Time: November 15, 2008, 6:02 pm

this thing is neat ! goinna keep thsi runnign to see how many people statisticly died while i slept !

AND THEN I WILL ABORT A FEW BABIES

hehehe ,

Pingback from De quoi meurent-on ? » Voirlemonde.net
Time: December 22, 2008, 3:47 pm

[…] Clicker ici pour acceder au site ! « Quelques toilettes differentes ! – Lizard Island!! » […]

Comment from ACM1PT,Bananero
Time: January 3, 2009, 2:06 pm

chupenmen la poronga mal paridos

Comment from play black jack online free
Time: January 15, 2009, 11:54 am

I happened upon this site while following the links from another site. Your site is wonderful and i bookmarked it. Thank your for the hard work you must have put in to create this wonderful facility. Keep up the excellent work

Comment from billygenemcjobbyjabber
Time: February 21, 2009, 9:28 am

the world is over-populated as is

Comment from billygenemcjobbyjabber
Time: February 21, 2009, 9:28 am

the world is over-populated as is

Comment from juggalette!
Time: April 27, 2009, 2:36 pm

i think that the abortion thing is there not because of the little babies but for the ladies that get infections and die from it! everyone dies you know!!!

Pingback from AAAAAAAAAAAH!!! MUEEETTEEEEEE ASESINATOOO!!! « El moixarnon es un pez???
Time: May 3, 2009, 11:04 am

[…] Mayo 3, 2009 a 4:04 pm (General) Bueno mozalbetes, como vosotros estáis siempre muy ocupados y hay que daros todo masticado os cuelgo una lista en la que tenéis los muertos por hora en el mundo por las causas que se indican (en el primer paréntesis los muertos por día y en el segundo por año) La lista sale de una web (clic aquí!!) que cuenta los muertos por segundo en el mundo y basa sus datos en los informes de la OMS, esa empresa que dice que esta gripe puede ser una terrible pandemia… Y para que no me digan nada el original en castellano sale de aquí (clic!!) Tengo que decir en mi favor que los cálculos por día y año me los he currado yooooo!!! jejeje AH! y el orden por cantidad también…ejem!! […]

Pingback from RIP, David Carridine..
Time: June 4, 2009, 9:33 pm

[…] Re: RIP, David Carridine.. Realtime Death Toll Counter […]

Comment from Francois 1er
Time: June 19, 2009, 6:17 am

a line about deaths caused by work accident could be rather interresting

Comment from afy
Time: July 7, 2009, 8:09 am

oh my god!!!

Comment from 777
Time: August 2, 2009, 8:14 am

those numbers will vastly increase soon. According to the Bible, we are in the end times, and 1/3 will die. And for you wackos who say we need to depopulate. What do u suggest? Another halacaust? Don’t worry the good Lord will come back before this world is overpopulated. If u don’t believe in God….your loss.

Pingback from Allt du måste veta om svininfluensan «
Time: August 29, 2009, 8:53 am

[…] Men stopp och belägg kära läsare och sanningssökare! Har du inte tänkt på att svininfluensahysterin kanske är till för att missleda oss från andra större nyheter? Här sitter jag och skriver om en ljummen influensa medan folk dör som flugor och människor i ”tredje världen” faller offer för läkemedelsföretagens vidriga experiment. Vad händer egentligen? (förutom att dom vill skrämma oss till vanvett) […]

Pingback from WIESO? WIESO STERBEN SO VIELE LEUTE???? *nachdenklich bin* - Mdchen.de-Forum
Time: November 4, 2009, 7:44 pm

[…] (permalink) Realtime Death Toll Counter Weit du, jeder muss mal sterben, aber das muss so sein. denn esschliet den kreislauf des lebens. die einen kommen, die anderen gehen dafr und immer so weiter, bis es irgendwann bumm macht, dann gibts gar nichts mehr. Antworten Mit Zitat antworten […]

Comment from Sam
Time: November 13, 2009, 9:46 pm

Have you seen the Death Toll Counter on Toxic Drums? http://www.toxicdrums.com/death-toll-counter.html

Comment from pravin
Time: December 7, 2009, 4:05 am

please any ifnormation

Comment from Roy
Time: December 15, 2009, 1:21 am

really a fantastic job. Is all the data believable? Can it be used as a kind of citation?

Pingback from Statistica AH1N1 « Blog ingineresc
Time: January 1, 2010, 12:51 pm

[…] making a virtue out of not thinking" – Bill Maher « Să sărbătorim Statistica AH1N1 ianuarie 1, 2010 În 2009, înspăimântătorul virus a ucis puţin peste 12 200 de oameni. Totîn 2009 au mai murit aşa: […]

Comment from Stephanie
Time: March 5, 2010, 12:44 pm

you would think that there would be more deaths in the war timer…

Comment from dahkdahbb
Time: March 11, 2010, 5:16 am

is this real

Write a comment





Close
E-mail It


© Copyright 2010 HammerUncut.com. All rights reserved.



Close
E-mail It